cva 289-003.361 - calithumpian parade - bathing beauties july 1, 1926

CVA 289-003.361 – Calithumpian Parade on Dominion Day (or Canada Day, as it has less prosaically been known since 1982) . Float of Jantzen swim wear (fn1). July 1, 1926. Many Dominion Day parades (notably in 1925) were identified in press reports as being calithumpian in nature. Just what was meant by that reference was left, largely, to readers’ imaginations.

What on earth is a “calithumpian” and what is its relevance in a blog about how Vancouver once was?

An article in the Woodstock (Ontario) Sentinel-Review, had this to say:

According to the Thamesford [Ontario] Calithumpian website, the word Calithumpian is an old English expression that is defined as a spontaneous clown parade or a party held after a public hanging. .  .

11 May 2017 Woodstock Sentinel-Review 

Celebratory public hangings?² Has this family-oriented blog taken a wrong turn?

Fear not, gentle reader. Read on.

The first press report mentioning Vancouver “calithumpians” seems to have been in an 1890 edition of the Vancouver Daily World. In a detailed account of the 1890 Labor Day events, it was noted that there had been a parade (or “procession”):

An interesting part of the procession, although not prepared by the [planning] committee, was a crowd of calithumpians mounted on fiery charges and fitted up in the most grotesque costumes. Colored men [probably not black men; more likely, white guys in ‘black face’] and clowns were the favored styles of masquerade. They kept good order and seemed to give the spice and variety to the procession. Some of their horses were fitted out with men’s trousers and braces [suspenders, presumably].

8 September 1890 Vancouver Daily World

This clipping is noteworthy here for at least three reasons. First, “calithumpians” is used in this report to refer not to the parade/procession, but to a subset of the participants. Second, these participants were identified as “colored men and clowns…[and] horses fitted out with men’s trousers and braces.” And third, the calithumpians were not ‘official’; their participation wasn’t planned, but seemingly spontaneous.

In 1925, it was announced by the Dominion Day planning group, that the parade associated with the occasion that year, would be calithumpian in nature. It seems that the term had fallen into disuse since the late 19th century, and the author of an article in the Vancouver Sun posed a good question at the outset of his piece:

What is a calithumpian parade? That is the question being asked by thousands of Vancouver citizens following the announcement by the committee in charge of the Dominion Day celebration that such a parade will be one of the great features of the mammoth display proposed for the celebration of Canada’s natal day in Vancouver. Well, one description is that  it is a boisterous, noisy and spectacular compilation of entertaining public features, pleasing to the eye. . . [It] resembles the Mardi Gras, which has made New Orleans famous, and will be the first parade of its kind held on the Pacific Coast. It consists of a burlesque of every known animal, prehistoric or existent, birds of the air, fowl of the earth, fish of the sea. Every animal from an elephant to a cat will be represented. Throughout the parade, fifty to seventy-five clowns – amateur and professional – will contribute their antics to the general revelry.  Hick bands, colored minstrels, wonderful impersonators of public and private citizens, will also be on the programme.

27 April 1925 Vancouver Sun

The Province (in a piece published 8 June 1925) pointed out that the Dominion Day parade of 1925 would have “floats [that] will be historic, fanciful and funny. . . and will be the most elaborate in design ever attempted in the city. . . [and] the committee has been informed that thousands of visitors will come to the city from the United States for the celebration, and it is expected one of the greatest crowds on record will be on hand. . .”

Post-1925 press mentions of calithumpians referred exclusively to parades (not participants).  And these reports nearly always referred to parades that a present-day Vancouver resident would instantly recognize. There would be clowns, floats and marching bands, as opposed to the earlier typical participants – soldiers, horse-drawn wagons, and (in 1890, at least) horses fitted out with men’s trousers!

Another new element of the 1925-and-later parades was that they seemed to be designed to appeal to outsiders as compared with earlier parades which were principally for residents. Perhaps that was the most significant meaning of the 1925-and-later calithumpian parades: they were ‘thumping’ the tourism drum.

cva 149-04 - section of dominion day parade on cordova street between abbott and cambie looking east july 1 1887 j a brock photo

CVA 149-04 – Section of Dominion Day Parade on Cordova Street. July 1 1887. J A Brock photo. A pre-1925 parade, consisting principally of soldiers marching and horses drawing wagons. It seems that the calithumpian nature of the 1925 Dominion Day parade was the turning point – floats, bands, and clowns were in the ascendancy.


¹The corporate slogan of Jantzen for a number of years (displayed on the float) was “The suit that changed bathing to swimming”. For more on Jantzen and its connection to Vancouver, see here.

²The last public execution in B.C. was in 1959 at Oakalla Prison, in the Vancouver suburb of Burnaby.

This entry was posted in parades, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to WHAT-ithumpians?!

  1. bcfilmguy says:

    I recently had cause to research a Rotary Club’s “callithumpian parade” in rural Ontario, ca. 1937. I learned that it was boisterous parade with band instruments consisting of crude noisemakers such as pots, tin horns, and cowbells. In my opinion, such a parade was distingushed more by its noise and improvised instruments than by the participation of clowns or blackface minstrels. I didn’t find any connection with capital punishment, either.

  2. Dare Gramma says:

    Here in Oz Callithumpian (or callathumpian) is synonymous with atheist, but less heavy. By the way, ‘atheist’ implies there is a God to not believe in…

  3. P says:

    Hi there! Do you by chance have a link to the Woodstock sentential article? Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s